if the Senator will yield, at this time we cannot agree to such an understanding. As the Senator has noted, this amendment has generated a very significant interest. Debate has been, obviously, substantive and there is still a fair amount of debate that has to flow under the bridge before we can close the game, if I can mix metaphors.
Discussing the ongoing debate regarding a significant amendment.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
If all the nuclear power plants were closed in this country, it's the equivalent of adding 115 million cars to the road.
I think Dr. Rivlin is absolutely correct on both points, and Simpson-Bowles did the same thing that Domenici-Rivlin did, which was to actually increase benefits to single women over 85, and low-income individuals.
A lot of that economic growth was driven by a bubble, and I don't really think we want to revisit that.
Meeting state and national carbon reduction goals will be compromised without existing nuclear power plants.