$2.65 billion is not zeroing out counterintelligence and counterterrorism. It is a large add-on, $2.65 billion. The only difference is we are suggesting in law where it ought to be spent, instead of saying you can do what you want and then come back to the committee and tell us why you did it that way. We should tell them where it should be spent before the fact, not after the fact. Our amendment adds money to counterterrorism. I think that is what we should be doing as a Senate.
John B. Breaux: “$2.65 billion is not zeroing out counterintelligence and counterterrorism. It is a large add-on, $2.65 billion. The only…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for counterintelligence and counterterrorism in a Senate amendment.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I do not think it was so much a problem with the prison as it was with people who ran the prison. It is not the physical plant that caused the problem. It is the people who were running the prison. If we do demolish a prison, are we not…
Good morning, Mr. President and colleagues. I was very interested in listening to the distinguished Senator from Georgia and the Senator from Pennsylvania. I am trying to keep track of what he was quoting from. We decided he was quoting…
Mr. President, and anyone who may be listening to this ``debate''-- which is really not a debate yet but probably will be a debate when we vote on Thursday when the time is allocated for Members to speak to present their positions on the…
today we are honored by the nomination of Debbie Hersman to serve as a member of the National Transportation Safety Board. Along with Senator Hollings, I have spent a great deal of time over the last 5 years working with Debbie. She has…