I want to ask a question. It is a legitimate question. If we can all--almost all can--agree that the minimum wage increase is a good idea, the repeal of the gas tax is a good idea, and the passage of the TEAM legislation, as the majority leader described it, is a good idea, why should we not just take these up separately, debate them separately and vote on them separately? The ones that are good will pass, and the ones not good will not pass. What is wrong with doing them separately?
John B. Breaux: “I want to ask a question. It is a legitimate question. If we can all--almost all can--agree that the minimum wage…”
On the recordMay 7, 1996
Said by
John B. Breaux
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the process of combining multiple legislative issues for debate and vote.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
Jun 26, 2003
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…
Apr 26, 2012
Let me suggest it is a program that is more popular today than the Congress that wrote it.
Jul 31, 2003
I strongly support the Singapore and Chile Free Trade Agreements and believe they will promote domestic growth in manufacturing and exports. I look forward to seeing these agreements enacted into law. However, I am concerned about the…