I rise, as have some of our colleagues today, to express my deepest sympathy to Senator Paul Coverdell's friends, family, and to his wife Nancy, as others throughout the State of Georgia as well as throughout this country mourn the passing of one of our colleagues who, indeed, was a very special person. I think when we reflect on the times we had and the opportunity we had to spend with Paul Coverdell, we will certainly remember him as a Senator's Senator; by that I mean a person who was really interested not so much in the message of the day but, rather, in actually working together to bring to this floor and to the American people legislative products that were appropriate to get the job done. I think all of us, when we see our legislative branches becoming more and more partisan and more and more separated by imaginary aisles that separate us, can think back and remember Paul Coverdell as a person who was willing to work with anyone who was willing to work with him in order to accomplish legislation that was in the interest of this whole country.
John B. Breaux: “I rise, as have some of our colleagues today, to express my deepest sympathy to Senator Paul Coverdell's friends…”
Editor's note · Context
Paying tribute to Senator Paul Coverdell following his passing.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I will take a few moments to explain my position on this important legislative effort and point to the fact that I have worked on a substitute amendment that has the ability to bring both sides together in a way we have not yet achieved…
It's certainly not a newsworthy item that someone has found out that there's a Federal program in Washington that could be subject to waste, fraud, and abuse.
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…
it is interesting that the authors, the Senators who oppose the amendment, say the bill is going to create 660,000 jobs. If it is going to create 660,000 jobs, there is no problem. The people would be able to bring the money back and pay 5…