I think also these are national wildlife refuges. There are a number of State wildlife refuges that States have set aside that also have production on them as well. Congress set this up, as the Senator well knows--I helped write section 1002 over in the other body--as an area that was going to be looked to for potential exploration. The remaining 19 million acres in the rest of the wildlife refuges in ANWR was going to be set aside for no activity. But Congress specifically made a decision: Look, we are going to reserve section 1002 for potential exploration and production. That is exactly what the Washington Post and the New York Times were commending Congress for at that time. When President Jimmy Carter signed this bill, they knew that section had been set aside for the purposes of looking at potential oil and gas exploration. Now, all of a sudden, we come back and say: No, we just can't touch it. I think that is not being fair or balanced.
John B. Breaux: “I think also these are national wildlife refuges. There are a number of State wildlife refuges that States have set…”
On the recordMarch 5, 2002
Said by
John B. Breaux
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the potential for oil and gas exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
Jun 5, 2003
if we are going to look in the MARAD program for huge amounts of waste, fraud, and abuse compared to everything else, I would suggest that we're going to be spending a lot of time, with little results.
Jun 5, 2003
It's certainly not a newsworthy item that someone has found out that there's a Federal program in Washington that could be subject to waste, fraud, and abuse.
Jul 31, 2003
I am also concerned about criminal liability as it applies to oil spills. In fact, during the 106th Congress, I introduced legislation to address a long-standing problem which adversely affects the safe and reliable maritime transport of…