H.R. 2754, as amended by the House of Representatives, would have required that third country anti-dumping cases taken by the Office of the USTR to the third country be adjudicated in a manner similar to that provided by the agreement. Some were concerned that S. 629 would require that the injurious pricing action be taken in accordance with the laws of that third country, without regard to whether those laws are consistent with the agreement. I intend to work with Senator Lott to ensure that such third country proceedings are consistent with the injurious pricing actions of the agreement.
John B. Breaux: “H.R. 2754, as amended by the House of Representatives, would have required that third country anti-dumping cases taken…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing H.R. 2754 and concerns regarding third country anti-dumping cases.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I will just make a couple of comments in opposition to the resolution because I think the resolution is sort of a broad-brush approach that takes down everything the FCC has recommended, things that make sense that are good and also things…
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…
It's certainly not a newsworthy item that someone has found out that there's a Federal program in Washington that could be subject to waste, fraud, and abuse.