If we want to balance the Federal budget, I suggest we not do it on the backs of our senior citizens. That is what my good colleague from Maryland is asking Members to do. I am asking that our seniors, our most vulnerable people in society, those who are so wealthy at $33,000 worth of income, who have to pay and get their Medicare furnished to them by the Federal Government, I ask that they not be asked to burden another 35 percent increase, which they have been asked to do since 1993. I don't think it is fair to ask our senior citizens to carry that burden when the younger Americans, who pay the bulk of our taxes, are those who should be asked to pay the burden. One thing I want to make sure Members understand when they vote on this amendment is, never in the history of this tax has one penny of it ever gone into the Social Security system--not one penny--since 1993. It has all been dedicated to Medicare Part A.
Jim Bunning: “If we want to balance the Federal budget, I suggest we not do it on the backs of our senior citizens. That is what my…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the impact of budget balancing on senior citizens during a debate.
Share
More from Jim Bunning
Should we not be concerned about the impact this, paired with the large budget deficits that this administration has projected, will have on my 40 grandchildren and future generations?
This is a stunning case, knowing that the SEC has changed hands and things, that they would not jump down this after the Madoff--Bernie--after his case hit the papers.
How would you grade the bill the Senate passed in the last Congress and the bill that recently passed the House in terms of improving the relationships between the premium property owners pay and their actual risk?
I have had the great fortune of having three wonderful careers during my life: one as a husband and father of 9 children and a grandfather of 40, one as a Major League baseball player for 27 years, and one in public service for 30 years…