Political Quotes

James M. Jeffords: The renewable fuels and MTBE provisions contained in H.R. 4, as passed by the Senate, constitute an agreement among many…

On the recordJune 12, 2002
The renewable fuels and MTBE provisions contained in H.R. 4, as passed by the Senate, constitute an agreement among many competing interests that is designed to get rid of MTBE and increase renewable fuel use. After the reformulated gasoline program went into effect in 1995, many refiners chose to use MTBE to satisfy the minimum 2 percent oxygen requirement of the program. Oxygenates reduce tailpipe emissions of carbon monoxide and other ozone precursors and provide a clean source of high octane, thereby displacing such toxic gasoline octane enhancers as benzene, toluene, and 1,3 butadiene. After implementation of the RFG program, increasing detection of MTBE in ground water and surface water led California to establish a schedule to ban MTBE and 13 other States have followed with their own MTBE bans. It became clear that the combination of a phase out of MTBE in these states and the continued existence of the two percent oxygen content requirement for RFG could result in a potentially disruptive and abrupt transition to ethanol in states that did not have a history of using ethanol.
Said by
James M. Jeffords

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the renewable fuels and MTBE provisions in H.R. 4 during Senate debate.

Share

More from James M. Jeffords

Sep 6, 2006

Thank you. Mr. Wehrum, a major challenge facing EPA is securing the resources needed to successfully develop and implement the renewable fuels standard, or RFS.

congress.gov
Jun 16, 2005

today I speak on Senator Bingaman's amendment to set a national goal to obtain 10 percent of our Nation's electricity from renewable resources. I support this idea. In fact, I have filed an amendment to go one step further--requiring 20…

govinfo.gov
Sep 6, 2006

As you may know, International Paper is seeking a permit to burn tires at its facility in upstate New York.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2005

I will be brief but concise. This is not a vote about reducing mercury by 90 percent by 2009 or even 70 percent by the year 2030. That is a red herring. This is not a vote about the opponents' wildly outdated claims on the potential cost…

govinfo.gov