this bill contains a very carefully crafted formula. This committee worked for close to a year to develop the formula contained in S. 1072. Balance, that is what this bill is about. The donor States such as Texas have gained 95 percent. That has been their goal for 6 years. Some would say for longer. Now they have achieved their goal and they are still complaining. This formula is fair. The formula the Senator from Texas put forward would undermine the highway program in many States and therefore I oppose the amendment. I yield the floor.
James M. Jeffords: “this bill contains a very carefully crafted formula. This committee worked for close to a year to develop the formula…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the fairness of a highway funding formula in relation to donor states during Senate debate.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
the proposed budget, while far more realistic than previous years, falls short of our commitment to America's veterans. The amendment would provide an additional $1.5 billion for VA health care in fiscal year 2007, improving funding for…
as we prepare to give the final approval to the highway bill conference report I would like to thank Chairman Inhofe and Senators Bond and Baucus and all of the Senators and staff who have helped to move this bill forward. The bill we are…
These innovations have the potential to move us into an era when driving a car or truck will no longer mean causing dangerous, global-warming pollution or using up scarce resources.
I regard the RFS as the first step and one that only produces transition fuel on our way to more a climate-friendly future.