I commend my good friend. He has articulately outlined and put the issues in focus as to what we are discussing. Coming from Vermont, one of the States that has the most desire, perhaps, to take advantage of the situation, going to my own personal history back to 1939, I was just a kid, but we had the first commercial windmill in the United States. It was working fine until a hurricane blew it away. It was an example to us of what the potential is. Now we have windmills going over the State, up and down the State. Hopefully, there will be more and more. We have them located in nice places that do not spoil the view. What a great source of energy to take advantage of, especially in a State that is really being hard hit by all of the acid rain and other stuff that floats to us from places known and unknown. But I want to share with everyone the experiences we have had. Going back again, 29 years ago, the wind energy program started. It has come quite a ways, but now is the time to really maximize its utility and to keep this Nation going in the direction which will lead us away from the huge problems we have with being so dependent upon foreign oil and all those matters.
James M. Jeffords: “I commend my good friend. He has articulately outlined and put the issues in focus as to what we are discussing. Coming…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential of wind energy and its development in Vermont.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
Even a diehard Red Sox fan has to give the devil his due. Probably the most moving moment in the history of baseball was when longtime New York Yankees first baseman Lou Gehrig walked on the field to accept the tribute of his fans and…
exactly 1 month ago I praised the Appropriations Committee's efforts to fund the State Revolving Fund for Wastewater Treatment and for Drinking Water at the highest possible levels. Today, however, I am gravely concerned about the overall…
I regard the RFS as the first step, and one that only produces a transition fuel on our way to a more climate-friendly future.
I will be brief but concise. This is not a vote about reducing mercury by 90 percent by 2009 or even 70 percent by the year 2030. That is a red herring. This is not a vote about the opponents' wildly outdated claims on the potential cost…