It is reassuring to know there are provisions to recognize State statutes and avoid unintentionally changing the responsibilities education agencies have under other Federal laws. However, we need more than a priority for concurrence among these officials and the Governor in the review of applications. That does not prohibit the Secretaries from approving grants to States where concurrence is not evident. Concurrence and explicit agreement, stated in the State plan, must be a condition for the Secretaries' approval. Without explicit statements of agreement, the Federal departments are in the business of judging the degree of agreement at the State level, and does not assure that the various education agencies and officials responsible for the programs affected by the plan are on board. There need to be something up from in the plan itself to show this agreement.
James M. Jeffords: “It is reassuring to know there are provisions to recognize State statutes and avoid unintentionally changing the…”
Editor's note · Context
Jeffords discusses the need for explicit agreement in state education plans for federal grant approvals.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
I regard the RFS as the first step, and one that only produces a transition fuel on our way to a more climate-friendly future.
throughout my 30 years in the Congress, I have considered myself a free-trader. I believe that breaking down barriers to trade and opening access to markets in a fair and balanced way in the long run benefits all economies, both consumers…
while we are nearing completion of this bill, I would like to take a few minutes to highlight some of the projects in the bill for my State of Vermont. Throughout our work on this bill, I have worked to find a way to use the Army Corps of…
first, I commend my partner for the cooperation we have had on this bill. I yield back the remainder of my time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. All time has been yielded back. The question is on agreeing to amendment No. 4684, the McCain…