Also, I have letters from the Governors to all of us with respect to that. We have brought this over here. We have explained it to staffs and they agreed with us, 65 to 35. I wanted you to keep that in mind. Second, we are a negative producer. What are they afraid of? We only produce 70 percent of the milk consumed in New England. We are not a threat to anybody. Mr. President, 30 percent of our milk comes from New York and Pennsylvania. It can come from Wisconsin. It can come from Minnesota. We are not creating any barriers to anybody. We say our consumers are so desirous of making sure that our farmers are there--they love the cows on the hillsides. That is New England. It is tradition. All we are asking is to be treated as any other big State can be. New York has an order that helps protect their producers, California does, other States do. Why can we not, as six little States up in New England tucked off up in the corner there, have the ability to protect our dairy farms?
James M. Jeffords: “Also, I have letters from the Governors to all of us with respect to that. We have brought this over here. We have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for dairy farm protections for New England states.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
Thank you. Mr. Wehrum, a major challenge facing EPA is securing the resources needed to successfully develop and implement the renewable fuels standard, or RFS.
throughout my 30 years in the Congress, I have considered myself a free-trader. I believe that breaking down barriers to trade and opening access to markets in a fair and balanced way in the long run benefits all economies, both consumers…
As you may know, International Paper is seeking a permit to burn tires at its facility in upstate New York.
I will be brief but concise. This is not a vote about reducing mercury by 90 percent by 2009 or even 70 percent by the year 2030. That is a red herring. This is not a vote about the opponents' wildly outdated claims on the potential cost…