I do think we need to keep in mind, regardless of our support for the Frank amendment, that the overriding consideration for us being in NATO is because it is in our national interest. And the overriding reason for us encouraging and participating and actually providing the leadership for expansion of NATO into the Czech Republic and Hungary and Poland, and thereafter, as the gentleman said, to other countries, including Slovenia, Romania, and the Baltic States, is because of our national interest. And that ought to be the overriding factor. We will push hard for burden sharing in every way.
Doug Bereuter: “I do think we need to keep in mind, regardless of our support for the Frank amendment, that the overriding consideration…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing NATO expansion and burden sharing during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Doug Bereuter
I just wanted to assure the gentlewoman from Ohio, there is nothing that deauthorizes a program in our legislation and nothing that specifically authorizes additional funds. And to the gentleman from California, this legislation does not…
The gentleman from Florida has already pointed out the problems that this creates for the other committees of this Congress, that they should have some input in the preparation of a conference report.
Certainly I am not enthused about it, but to the extent that GE can keep jobs here because of export, those are jobs that are left in New York State.
The amendment points to an important subject, the need for prompt implementation of the Act, and we certainly think that the Committee on International Relations and other relevant committees ought to receive periodic reports and hold…