To overturn Roe now would be an act of constitutional vandalism -- not conservative, but reactionary.
Charles Fried: “To overturn Roe now would be an act of constitutional vandalism -- not conservative, but reactionary.”
Editor's note · Context
Charles Fried discusses his change of opinion regarding Roe v. Wade, labeling its potential overturning as reactionary.
Share
More from Charles Fried
The radical majority on the Supreme Court may be participating in what he called, a slow motion coup d`etat.
I think the idea that one can make a choice not to seek health care throughout one's life is simply not realistic and cannot be the basis for an attack on the constitutionality.
This is what would be the coup d`etat, because these gerrymandered state legislatures in all the swing states -- Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia would then be able to send the electors they choose, not the electors…
Does Congress have the right to regulate health care insurance? Of course it does.