Mr. Speaker, as to the complexity of this legislation, I would differ with the description of the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) that this is a complex matter. In fact, it is nothing close to that, unless we try to read items such as we just heard about asbestos and banking and Medicare and drug abuse and these kinds of things into that resolution. None of these items appear here. This is strictly on the motto that we read in front of us here on the House floor and whether it is suitable for the Congress to suggest that it be displayed in public buildings around the country. I think as far as whether individuals need hearings to understand the importance of whether 'In God We Trust' is still a useful motto for the country, I would suggest that most Members probably have a firm opinion about that at the moment.
Bob Schaffer: “Mr. Speaker, as to the complexity of this legislation, I would differ with the description of the gentleman from…”
On the recordJuly 24, 2000
Said by
Bob Schaffer
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the simplicity of legislation regarding the display of the motto 'In God We Trust'.
Share
More from Bob Schaffer
Jun 11, 2002
Yes, sure, the gentleman has described it accurately. Let us just use, for example, the base benefit amount that exists in this proposal, which is $250. That would be the tax benefit to an American taxpayer.
Feb 15, 2012
the only individuals who can guarantee that these dollars are being spent efficiently are the ones who are closest to the children who are affected.
Jun 12, 2002
if I could amplify that, I want to be frank and open and honest with respect to the political realities of this. Republicans and conservatives around the country cannot afford to stand by and abandon the field to our friends on the left on…