I intend to oppose the Kennedy-Feinstein amendment even though I am sympathetic with many of the arguments they make. I am in agreement with the idea that this is a feasibility study only and that the study should go forward, but my primary concern is that there be no nuclear testing of this particular device or any aspect of this particular device while the study is going on. It is my understanding that is part of the law accepted previously, but I want to make it absolutely sure. For that purpose, I intend, following this vote, some time during the debate, to call up my amendment which makes it clear that there can be no nuclear testing under the cover of a study of the RNEP as it is so called. That amendment is offered not only for myself and my colleague from Utah, Senator Hatch, but we are joined by Senator Collins of Maine and Senator Domenici of New Mexico. I wish to make it clear that my goal is to see to it that there be no nuclear testing in the name of the study unless there is a specific congressional vote with respect to that testing.
Bill Bennett: “I intend to oppose the Kennedy-Feinstein amendment even though I am sympathetic with many of the arguments they make. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Kennedy-Feinstein amendment regarding nuclear testing during a feasibility study.
Share
More from Bill Bennett
If this book was 'Going Rogue,' I think the next stage needs to be going substantive, going policy.
If Herman Cain cannot stand up to these charges, if he refuses to, then he should step out of the race. A man big enough to run for president should be big enough to have a full and candid press conference on all of this.
A man big enough to be president is big enough to have the truth told about him.
as we come to the final vote on the stimulus package, I express my great regret that I am going to be unable to vote for it because we clearly need a stimulus package that works. The economy is in serious trouble, and we need to do the…