I do not challenge his patriotism, but I challenge his accuracy and his conclusions. I think we should also understand that as we differ on this, we are not attacking someone's patriotism. That canard has been thrown across the aisle at those of us who stand to defend the President and differ with our colleagues. He quoted David Kay, the President's arms inspector, as saying they are admitting now there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. What he failed to quote from David Kay was the statement that after concluding his inspection in Iraq, David Kay came to the conclusion that Saddam Hussein was in fact more dangerous than we thought he was when we launched the war. I think that is the point that keeps being ignored and must be emphasized again.
Bill Bennett: “I do not challenge his patriotism, but I challenge his accuracy and his conclusions. I think we should also understand…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the accuracy of claims regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Share
More from Bill Bennett
Well, it will be the second time he's gone to Copenhagen and come back empty-handed. The disgrace of Copenhagen was on display yesterday. Hugo Chavez took the floor, denounced capitalism to thunderous applause, standing ovation, wants to…
Lord no. I mean, if there's one thing that's clear in Washington right now, it's that there's a huge difference between the parties.
I will confess to having taken the easy route. Social Security is the easiest one to fix because we can make the kinds of changes I described here that go back to the effort started by Senator Moynihan. Here is the chart. We can see Social…
I think it's bad policy to do that. I also think it's going to be very bad politics, because of the opposition.