I rise tonight to urge Members to vote against H.R. 2887, the Pediatric Exclusivity Act, as it is on the suspension calendar with controversial provisions. First approved in 1997, pediatric exclusivity granted the drug companies an extra 6 months extension on their patents if they would provide a study to determine if the drug was beneficial to young people. Upon completion of that study, the FDA grants a pediatric exclusivity to the drug which the drug companies then used as a marketing tool to promote and increase drug sales. The grant of pediatric exclusivity only takes place upon completion of a study without anyone knowing what the study says about the safety, the effectiveness and dosage requirements for young people. There is no requirement to change the labeling on the drug to reflect the changes needed. There is no label to tell the doctors what is the proper dosage, how to dispense and use the drug safely. Before we grant pediatric exclusivity to a drug and it is then marketed as being FDA approved for pediatric use, we should at least know what is the effect of the drug on young people. Under the current bill, after the study is completed, exclusivity is granted, but whether the drug helps or hurts young people remains a secret and is not disclosed to doctors, patients, or their families. Physicians, patients, and their families should have a right to know about the drug before they ingest it.
Bart Stupak: “I rise tonight to urge Members to vote against H.R. 2887, the Pediatric Exclusivity Act, as it is on the suspension…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Pediatric Exclusivity Act during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Bart Stupak
So the actual wording of the referendum states, ``A voter approval requirement does not apply to Indiana tribal gaming.'' By passing H.R. 2176, Congress will bring about a final resolution to this land claim dispute that has been going on…
Congressman Bart Stupak of Michigan announced today that he won't seek re-election. The anti-abortion Democrat has been the target of Tea Party activists for playing a key role in getting health care reform passed.
Yes, it did. We were shocked that they would even bring it up in like the first meeting and then in the second meeting we had with them.
Because they began the negotiation under IGRA, as required under section 20, to begin a negotiation with the Governor, and they had to make a settlement with the Governor, who can do it. So, instead of going back to court, they used the…