Political Quotes

Bart Stupak: I urge a ``no'' vote on this legislation. As a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, I am concerned that the…

On the recordMay 3, 2006
I urge a ``no'' vote on this legislation. As a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, I am concerned that the Republicans are attempting to move legislation that would significantly alter Federal law regarding the refinery permitting process without a committee hearing, without a markup, without even allowing the bill to be amended on the floor. This bill is a rerun of the Gasoline for America's Security (GAS) Act, which was only approved by the House by a vote of 212 to 210 after the Republican Leadership held the vote open for 45 minutes, twisted arms. That GAS Refinery bill was a bad bill then, and now this bill before us is even worse. By pushing refinery legislation through the House without any hearings, debate, or amendments, we are doing the American public a disservice. While the proponents of this legislation contend that oil companies are unable to improve their refinery capacity because of excessive regulation, the truth is, oil companies have intentionally reduced domestic refining capacity to drive up gas prices. I have here internal memos from Mobil, Chevron, and Texaco, specifically advocating that these companies limit their refining capacity to drive up prices. From September 2004 to September 2005, refineries profits increased by 255 percent. During the first quarter of 2006, Valero Energy Corporation, the largest refiner in the United States, reported profits 60 percent higher than last year.…
Said by
Bart Stupak

Share

More from Bart Stupak

Mar 21, 2010

I agree. If it's not directed at me, then he must have directed the address to the Member of the House. And we have to maintain proper decorum in the House of Representatives, set the examples and keep our cool under intense pressure and…

transcripts.cnn.com
Jul 1, 2010

Yes, it did. We were shocked that he would even bring it up in the first meeting, and then in the second meeting we had with them.

transcripts.cnn.com
Jun 25, 2008

Because they began the negotiation under IGRA, as required under section 20, to begin a negotiation with the Governor, and they had to make a settlement with the Governor, who can do it. So, instead of going back to court, they used the…

govinfo.gov
Sep 22, 2010

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. Five years ago, Congress passed the National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act, or NASPER, into law, making it the only statutory authorized program to assist States in…

govinfo.gov