If your question, and my colleague should have stayed at Michigan State longer because he would have learned this, if his question was and if the truth was that every witness said to have this guy testify, which the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Barrett) said that is not the truth, based upon his hypothetical, if this was true, I am sure, I cannot speak for committee members, I would vote for it if his statement was true.
Bart Stupak: “If your question, and my colleague should have stayed at Michigan State longer because he would have learned this, if…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the validity of witness testimony in a committee hearing.
Share
More from Bart Stupak
Because they began the negotiation under IGRA, as required under section 20, to begin a negotiation with the Governor, and they had to make a settlement with the Governor, who can do it. So, instead of going back to court, they used the…
I congratulate the Pittsburgh Steelers on their sixth Super Bowl ring and their championship this year. But the last part of your resolution, and every football fan knows, that the standard for the entire NFL for championships is the Green…
I rise in support of S. 3397. Millions of Americans are prescribed narcotics for postoperative pain, bone fractures, and other ailments each year. However, most patients do not consume all the prescriptions they are prescribed. These drugs…
Yes, it did. We were shocked that they would even bring it up in like the first meeting and then in the second meeting we had with them.