I just had a question, Mr. Speaker. In your statement you indicated that the person would be better off under your tax plan because he would have more money in his pocket. Yet how do you justify the gentleman with the lunch bucket paying Federal taxes, and yet your tax bill repealed the alternative minimum corporate tax, so the corporations do not have to pay their taxes? How would that help the gentleman with the lunch bucket?
Bart Stupak: “I just had a question, Mr. Speaker. In your statement you indicated that the person would be better off under your tax…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the fairness of a tax plan during a House debate.
Share
More from Bart Stupak
Current law with respect to abortion services includes the Hyde amendment. The Hyde amendment and other similar statutes to it have been the law of the land on Federal funding of abortion since 1977 and apply to all other health care…
On the Federal claim brought forth by Bay Mills, the Sault tribe was not part of that action, and the Federal court said, your cousins--the Chippewas of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe--must be joined. Go back and get joined and come back…
I agree. If it's not directed at me, then he must have directed the address to the Member of the House. And we have to maintain proper decorum in the House of Representatives, set the examples and keep our cool under intense pressure and…
I am pleased health care reform passed the House of Representatives and the Congress on March 21 so 32 million more Americans will have access to health insurance. Americans are already realizing the benefits of this legislation. For…