Ketanji Brown Jackson: “One of the projects of the Roberts Court is to undo the progress of the 1960s and make the 19th century great again.”

This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.

To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.

Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?

You know, there are lots of limits on what judges can do, and I try to be very, very mindful and scrupulous with respect to that because, as you say, our obligation is to be unbiased in our approach.