The court has created a zone of lawlessness within which the executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes.
Ketanji Brown Jackson: “The court has created a zone of lawlessness within which the executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as…”
Editor's note · Context
Jackson condemns the ruling as enabling executive lawlessness.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
The consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fall’s elections would be extreme.
Taking its eye off the ball, the majority misses the Government’s actual objective: to secure our imprimatur for its effort to foment chaos ahead of the November elections.
This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.
Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?