Even the mere appearance of favoritism can undermine confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.
Editor's note · Context
Jackson highlights how perceived favoritism affects public trust in the judiciary.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
At bottom, this case is about whether that action amounts to a structural overhaul that usurps Congress's policymaking prerogatives—and it is hard to imagine deciding that question in any meaningful way after those changes have happened.
More caution (and more research) may be warranted before our longstanding precedents in this area can be seriously scrutinized or attacked—especially in cases where no party has made such a claim or presented any such argument.
The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity.
I think Bruen was wrongly decided. But if it is going to be our precedent, the majority should at least endeavor to apply it faithfully.