Ketanji Brown Jackson: “Today’s decision makes one thing clear: The Court’s objective is protecting guns, not consistently preserving any…”

The consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fall’s elections would be extreme.

It feels to me like the defendants ... are bringing it back to federal court before the state courts have really had a chance to sort out who is the source, what is their allegation with respect to how this causation is happening.

To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.

Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?