Ketanji Brown Jackson: “Congress plainly protected their right to do so when it crafted Title I. Yet, the Court ignores that right today.”

The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful.

When I get invitations to do things, I always have them screened by the legal office, the public information office, just to make sure that there are no ethical conflicts, that this is not a fundraiser, you know.

And the hardest part for judges is that we really cannot participate.

Today’s decision makes one thing clear: The Court’s objective is protecting guns, not consistently preserving any principle of law.