Congress plainly protected their right to do so when it crafted Title I. Yet, the Court ignores that right today.
Ketanji Brown Jackson: “Congress plainly protected their right to do so when it crafted Title I. Yet, the Court ignores that right today.”
Editor's note · Context
Jackson criticized the Court for overlooking the protections for retired disabled individuals.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
The harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the Government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.
This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.
The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful.
It feels to me like the defendants ... are bringing it back to federal court before the state courts have really had a chance to sort out who is the source, what is their allegation with respect to how this causation is happening.