Ketanji Brown Jackson: “This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects…”

The consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fall’s elections would be extreme.

To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.

Significant real-world harms can follow Supreme Court stay rulings, and when the court’s orders do not acknowledge that reality, they seem oblivious and ring hollow,

Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?