To operate in two different zones moving forward: one in which it is required to follow the law ... and another in which you can choose to violate the law
Ketanji Brown Jackson: “To operate in two different zones moving forward: one in which it is required to follow the law ... and another in which…”
Editor's note · Context
Jackson warns about the implications of the ruling creating law-free zones.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.
This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.
The Court’s conception of a color-blind Constitution and the Government’s (and principal dissent’s) cramped, group-specific reading of the Citizenship Clause are two sides of the same coin, stemming from a basic misunderstanding of the…
I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish.