On the recordJune 25, 2026
Hawaii chose to protect the unaware property owner while leaving open to gun owners the opportunity to carry firearms where consent has been provided.
Said by
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Hawaii chose to protect the unaware property owner while leaving open to gun owners the opportunity to carry firearms where consent has been provided.
Dissenting opinion on Supreme Court ruling
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
Today’s decision makes one thing clear: The Court’s objective is protecting guns, not consistently preserving any principle of law.
A zone of lawlessness within which the Executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes
The decision … gives the Executive the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate.