Ketanji Brown Jackson: “We do have a sense of what comes next: as with those past rulings, today’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm…”

The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful.

When I get invitations to do things, I always have them screened by the legal office, the public information office, just to make sure that there are no ethical conflicts, that this is not a fundraiser, you know.

This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.

To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.