On the recordJune 29, 2025
An existential threat to the rule of law.
Said by
Ketanji Brown Jackson
An existential threat to the rule of law.
Jackson characterized the ruling as a threat to legal principles.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
To be sure, the Court has not foreclosed States from challenging this blatantly unconstitutional Order.
This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.
When I get invitations to do things, I always have them screened by the legal office, the public information office, just to make sure that there are no ethical conflicts, that this is not a fundraiser, you know.