At a minimum, it will deprive Medicaid recipients in South Carolina of their only meaningful way of enforcing a right that Congress has expressly granted to them.
Ketanji Brown Jackson: “At a minimum, it will deprive Medicaid recipients in South Carolina of their only meaningful way of enforcing a right…”
Editor's note · Context
Jackson warns that the ruling harms Medicaid recipients' rights.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
You know, there are lots of limits on what judges can do, and I try to be very, very mindful and scrupulous with respect to that because, as you say, our obligation is to be unbiased in our approach.
Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?
The consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fall’s elections would be extreme.
The harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the Government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.