On the recordJune 23, 2026
The majority undermined the rule of law and rights of immigrants, and that the government should not be able to impose severe consequences because of unproven allegations.
Said by
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Source
rollcall.comThe majority undermined the rule of law and rights of immigrants, and that the government should not be able to impose severe consequences because of unproven allegations.
Dissenting opinion on immigration ruling
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
Given the fact-based nature of the issue in this case and the many serious harms that result from allowing the President to dramatically reconfigure the Federal Government, it was eminently reasonable for the District Court to maintain the…
the dual state that you lived in, and that you worked in, and that must be called out unflinchingly whenever it rears its head
a zone of lawlessness within which the Executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes
Hawaii chose to protect the unaware property owner while leaving open to gun owners the opportunity to carry firearms where consent has been provided.