Ketanji Brown Jackson: “Today’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people.”

Today’s decision makes one thing clear: The Court’s objective is protecting guns, not consistently preserving any principle of law.

Perhaps the degradation of our rule-of-law regime would happen anyway.

This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.

The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government.