The majority today is wrong as a matter of precedent: This Court has held that the Hobbs Act, like its precursors, sets up a single judicial review mechanism for agency rules and orders, and prevents later collateral attacks on them in other courts.
Justice Kagan's dissent focusing on the precedent set by the Hobbs Act.
Share
More from Elena Kagan
I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed.
No one doubts that the distribution of sexually explicit speech to children, of the sort involved here, can cause great harm.
I think that we should hold ourselves, sort of on both sides, to a standard of explaining why we're doing what we're doing.
I think that, as we have gotten more experienced in these constant requests that are coming to us about requests for emergency relief, that we better recognize that at least sometimes there is a need for additional information.