The Senator from Alaska has mentioned politics and that the steel industry evidently decided not to take advantage of this multibillion-dollar offer that he and I talked about a number of times. I made it very clear to the Senator from Alaska during our conversations that whereas we do make pipe in the United States, we only have about 40 million tons of production left. And we don't make pipe of the size that was required for what the Senator was talking about at ANWR. That was the only reason. It was not politics. The Senator talks about letters from the White House. I don't know if the Senator disagrees, but the Senator talks about letters from the White House. There was a reason for that. That was that the White House was and still is--they have been e-mailing all over the country and getting other people to e-mail because they have opposed this from the very beginning. They have opposed legacy costs. They made it very clear. All of their Cabinet officers made it very clear. The President made it clear. That is the reason we are reduced to simply having 1 year of health benefits because we have no other alternative. I would have, as the Senator from Alaska knows, voted probably for ANWR if Senator Stevens, who was equally as angry as I was over what transpired, had been allowed to proceed. But it was simply bludgeoned. I hope that the Senator would agree with that.
Jay Rockefeller: “The Senator from Alaska has mentioned politics and that the steel industry evidently decided not to take advantage of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the steel industry's response to a multibillion-dollar offer and the implications for ANWR.
Share
More from Jay Rockefeller
We are talking about dealing with everything from continuing resolutions, all of the appropriations, what are we going to do about ISIS, and all the rest of it, in a lame duck session forum.
one of the things that happened with the CBO scoring was that yes, there was a cost because you were keeping CHIP operating, but there was a savings because the children were not transferring into the Affordable Care Act, for example.
I thank Senator Johnson for his interest and support for this legislation and for his shared interest in strengthening cyber security. I also thank my colleague from South Dakota for drawing attention to the potential impact of this…
Just as a follow-up to the question of funding which was addressed, CBO actually has come out with an estimate on what all of this would cost. It is not $20 billion; it is in the area of zero up to $10 billion over that period of 4 years.





