Your comments are helpful because I think Members are concerned that accepting this CHIP shortfalls proposal means they will be giving tacit approval to other provisions in the bill that they don't really support--such as decreasing the CHIP allotment from 3 years to 22 years, or putting restrictions on how States can use the redistributed money, for example. But what I hear both of you saying, I think, is that the CHIP provisions in this package are causing a little bit of pain for everyone, but that the benefits of getting something done now far outweigh the downsides and that nothing in this CHIP package binds us as we move to reauthorize the program next year.
Jay Rockefeller: “Your comments are helpful because I think Members are concerned that accepting this CHIP shortfalls proposal means they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the CHIP shortfalls proposal during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Jay Rockefeller
I thank Senator Leahy for attempting to address my concerns about this bill. I thank his committee staff for working with my committee staff to insert clarifying report language.
If confirmed, I will commit to review all of the statutory requirements and congressional deadlines.
We need to provide more transitional housing and more training for law enforcement, counselors, and healthcare workers to make it easier for victims to come forward.
Furthermore, if we are going to potentially burden our government agencies with increased costs that will be associated with complying with the bill, then I think Congress should also provide these agencies with sufficient funding to deal…





