The other is the upper payment limit, which in fact is understood by some of us. And I do not know whether the Senator is aware that the Bush administration, which writes a letter against this--which maybe is not surprising, I don't know, but it is disappointing--has already promulgated a new regulation, which took effect in April, which solves most of the problem about which the Senator is talking. The problem he is taking about is real, but it has no place in this debate. First, the administration has moved to solve it. Secondly, it has no part in this debate. I yield the floor and reserve the remainder of my time.
Jay Rockefeller: “The other is the upper payment limit, which in fact is understood by some of us. And I do not know whether the Senator…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the upper payment limit and a new regulation from the Bush administration.
Share
More from Jay Rockefeller
today, I rise to reintroduce the Incentives to Educate American Children, or I TEACH, Act of 2014. With teacher retention rates on a steady decline nationwide, it is my hope that this legislation will encourage our best and brightest…
For hours and hours. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Farewell to the Senate
Furthermore, if we are going to potentially burden our government agencies with increased costs that will be associated with complying with the bill, then I think Congress should also provide these agencies with sufficient funding to deal…
Domestic violence is a deep national stain that every segment of our society must work to confront, prevent, and end.





