The other is the upper payment limit, which in fact is understood by some of us. And I do not know whether the Senator is aware that the Bush administration, which writes a letter against this--which maybe is not surprising, I don't know, but it is disappointing--has already promulgated a new regulation, which took effect in April, which solves most of the problem about which the Senator is talking. The problem he is taking about is real, but it has no place in this debate. First, the administration has moved to solve it. Secondly, it has no part in this debate. I yield the floor and reserve the remainder of my time.
Jay Rockefeller: “The other is the upper payment limit, which in fact is understood by some of us. And I do not know whether the Senator…”
On the recordJuly 25, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the upper payment limit and a new regulation from the Bush administration.
Share
More from Jay Rockefeller
Dec 2, 2014
If confirmed, I will commit to review all of the statutory requirements and congressional deadlines.
Sep 15, 2014
I am interested in the children who still have to be reached out to, in the Alabamas and West Virginias and Pennsylvanias and Ohios, et cetera.
Dec 9, 2014
Furthermore, if we are going to potentially burden our government agencies with increased costs that will be associated with complying with the bill, then I think Congress should also provide these agencies with sufficient funding to deal…
Dec 1, 2014
I incorrectly stated that the League has in place a policy requiring clubs to report to law enforcement.





