What he is basically saying, in an extraordinary statement, is that there shall be no closing of Guantanamo. But then he is saying that if Guantanamo is closed, that there shall be no taking of prisoners from Guantanamo and putting them anywhere within the United States of America, thereby, No. 1, casting extraordinary criticism on some of the toughest, finest and, when necessary, very tough prisons in the United States, including in his State, my State, and many other States. But what he is really saying is he wants Guantanamo to stay open. And by saying that, what he is saying is he wants to create more people who hate the United States and more people who go to the cause of al-Qaida, and I find that an extraordinary statement, which he has every right to make and every right to believe with a full heart. I just don't run into a whole lot of people who know the situation who think like that.
Jay Rockefeller: “What he is basically saying, in an extraordinary statement, is that there shall be no closing of Guantanamo. But then he…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of keeping Guantanamo Bay open during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Jay Rockefeller
Without congressional action, I say again, CHIP will run out of funding next fall, placing at risk the well-being of hundreds of thousands of children and pregnant women.
We need to change our culture through increased awareness and education to prevent domestic violence from occurring.
It is not right to shift the added financial burdens onto working families when a cost-effective solution for maintaining the coverage they already have exists.
Just as a follow-up to the question of funding which was addressed, CBO actually has come out with an estimate on what all of this would cost. It is not $20 billion; it is in the area of zero up to $10 billion over that period of 4 years.





