On the recordJuly 11, 1995
The answer is that they could, because those parts per million would relate to a benefit to health or the environment and, therefore, would be a nonquantifiable benefit to health or the environment.
Source
govinfo.govDavid Cay Johnston: “The answer is that they could, because those parts per million would relate to a benefit to health or the environment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of environmental regulations on health benefits.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 31, 1996
If I may answer that, because the Senator is a very thoughtful Senator and it is a fair question. First of all, let me say, on the issue of reprocessing, you would need a central facility for reprocessing anyway. So that does not solve the…
Jul 26, 1996
I very much appreciate the very warm and generous remarks of my colleague from New Mexico. While he is new in the chairmanship on this committee, he is not new to the committee. We have worked side by side for all of these 22 years…
Jul 31, 1996
Mr. President, what the Senator is saying is so illogical. We have established that the Federal Government has the duty to dispose of spent nuclear fuel, and the Senator is saying that that duty carries with it no responsibility to pay…
Other voices in this conversation
