The Senator is correct. And the critics read out of that statute the word ``solely,'' and they find ghosts everywhere. But ``solely'' means solely, and it is right there in the language. For the life of me, I cannot understand where people find ambiguity in it other than they are looking for it.
Defending the clarity of a statute during a Senate debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
As my good friend from New Mexico, the chairman of the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee and many other Members are aware, the subcommittee continues to support a strong Fusion Energy Sciences Program. As noted in the report…
There are many reasons to be against the McCain amendment, but the clearest, most indelible, most compelling reason is that to cut these funds now would subject the U.S. Government to greater penalties for termination costs than it would…
the answer is, yes, these projects for biomass electric will be eligible, and the Department should give full consideration to these projects along with those mentioned in the committee report. These appear to be promising technologies…
The University of New Orleans has developed an entrepreneurship program designed not only to assist in the development of skills, but also to assist in the creating of individual, family, and small businesses in our inner cities. The two…
Other voices in this conversation
