I would have no problem with proper language to do that. The problem is that, first of all, I think we have very clear language right now. I think it is very clear. The offered language creates its own ambiguity.
David Cay Johnston: “I would have no problem with proper language to do that. The problem is that, first of all, I think we have very clear…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the clarity of language in proposed legislation.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
I send a letter to the desk addressed to me dated today and signed by Terry R. Lash, Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, which details the principal arguments against terminating the advanced light water…
the Government cannot violate contractual rights. The second question is what is the duty of the Federal Government with respect to nuclear waste? It so happens that the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has decided that very…
And the Senator would not disagree you can't take away that right legislatively, can you?
I am sorry that I will not be able to support the amendment. In fact, I will oppose the amendment. But nevertheless, as a courtesy to my colleague, I will offer it. What it would do is to take four-tenths of 1 percent of each program in…





