I will answer the question like this. I do not care how many Cabinet people say this thing is ambiguous. It is not. It is as clear as the English language can be. Now, whether they are ingenuous or disingenuous in their criticism, I do not know. I know that this letter of administrative policy, much of it is, to be charitable, disingenuous, because I sat in the room and negotiated part of it and accepted some of the things that came from the administration and then was met with the argument coming back out that that which we accepted was a fault in the bill.
David Cay Johnston: “I will answer the question like this. I do not care how many Cabinet people say this thing is ambiguous. It is not. It…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the clarity of a letter of administrative policy during a debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 31, 1996
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Jul 31, 1996
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.





