The answer is we took care of whatever ambiguity there was at the behest of the Senator from Michigan. You will recall our negotiation on this, and we added quantifiable and nonquantifiable to the definition of benefit in section 621.
David Cay Johnston: “The answer is we took care of whatever ambiguity there was at the behest of the Senator from Michigan. You will recall…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to the definition of benefits in legislation.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
I rise today to speak to the merits of a program that has done great work in the field of medicine. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, or ATSDR, funded through the Environmental Protection Agency, has addressed the…
I simply rise in support of the position of the Senator from New Mexico. I was here several years ago speaking in favor of the continuation of the testing program, because I thought it was important for both reliability and safety. The…
There are many reasons to be against the McCain amendment, but the clearest, most indelible, most compelling reason is that to cut these funds now would subject the U.S. Government to greater penalties for termination costs than it would…
in the original form of our bill, we provided for 100 millirem radioactivity limit from the repository. However, because our friends from Nevada stated the EPA should have a role here, we amended that. The present bill now on third reading…





