Well, let us say that the director of EPA or another agency looks back and says, ``We have done a heck of a good job, we have great bureaucrats in this agency, and we do not think anything needs to be reviewed.'' So the slate is clean, it is a tabula rasa, it is a devoid of any rules to be reviewed. I am an aggrieved party and what is my remedy? To come to Congress and ask them to pass an act? That is it, is it not?
David Cay Johnston: “Well, let us say that the director of EPA or another agency looks back and says, ``We have done a heck of a good job, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of regulatory review and accountability in environmental agencies.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?





