Do I misread this when he says in the last paragraph on the first page that ``S. 343 would significantly delay this essential reform by requiring USDA to establish a peer review panel which satisfies the criteria in S. 343, submit a cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment [analyses] to the panel, and convene the panel to review the analyses''? He is not talking about appeal or effective date, he is talking about peer review, is he not?
Questioning the implications of S. 343 regarding peer review and reform delays.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
I understand. But after they made that decision and you say it is right then to help them set up a legal system, would you not use the American Bar Association and the International Law Institute, the United States-Vietnam Trade----
I am sorry that I will not be able to support the amendment. In fact, I will oppose the amendment. But nevertheless, as a courtesy to my colleague, I will offer it. What it would do is to take four-tenths of 1 percent of each program in…
I am sending to the desk a sense-of-the- Senate resolution on behalf of the distinguished Senator from West Virginia, Mr. Rockefeller, and others regarding the United States-Japan semiconductor trade agreement which is set to expire on…
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
Other voices in this conversation
