Here is what would happen. Within 1 year after the passage of this act, the head of each of the agencies shall look at all the rules under their supervision, determine which ones need to be looked at, and therefore come up with a preliminary schedule. That schedule will be published a year afterward. If this rule is on that schedule, then DuPont, since they are from Delaware--that is the only reason I use them--would not have to take further action because it is going to be reexamined. If it is not on the schedule and they want it reexamined, then they would petition. Their burden is to show that there is a substantial likelihood that the rule would not be able to reach, to satisfy the requirements of section 624.
David Cay Johnston: “Here is what would happen. Within 1 year after the passage of this act, the head of each of the agencies shall look at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the process for reviewing agency rules after the passage of a specific act.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?





