I think the Glenn bill is ambiguous on that question. I do not believe S. 343 is in its present form. We will debate that at a separate time. I am simply saying that the Glenn bill is subject to the same thing on peer review that he says the Secretary of Agriculture says S. 343 has. Only ours is more flexible with respect to peer review than his because we allow for informal peer review, and the Glenn bill does not.
Discussing the differences between the Glenn bill and S. 343 regarding peer review.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
This is sort of a version 2 of the Wellstone amendment, in that it seeks to take the rights of utilities and, secondarily, the rights of ratepayers of utilities, and abolish those by legislative fiat--which simply cannot be done. The…
Is my friend saying he will not give aid to help them change the legal system until the legal system is already changed?
I rise today to speak to the merits of a program that has done great work in the field of medicine. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, or ATSDR, funded through the Environmental Protection Agency, has addressed the…
There are many reasons to be against the McCain amendment, but the clearest, most indelible, most compelling reason is that to cut these funds now would subject the U.S. Government to greater penalties for termination costs than it would…
Other voices in this conversation
