We believe so, but if it needs to be further clarified, it can be. The idea here is that you want to have this determination made early enough in the process so that you can remedy the defects in the rule while the rule is still going on and not have to wait until it is all over with, because some of these rules take 2 or 3 years. And if you do not find out until, say, your final appeal is 6 or 9 months after the final rule, then you have to stay the rule and go back and do it all over again.
David Cay Johnston: “We believe so, but if it needs to be further clarified, it can be. The idea here is that you want to have this…”
On the recordJuly 10, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of timely determinations in regulatory processes.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Sep 5, 1996
The University of New Orleans has developed an entrepreneurship program designed not only to assist in the development of skills, but also to assist in the creating of individual, family, and small businesses in our inner cities. The two…
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Jul 31, 1996
Nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…





