If the Senator assumes that this amendment gives to the President that line-item veto, I assume that the Senator also assumes that that power is without limitation; that is to say, if the President has the authority under this amendment to balance the budget if Congress has failed to do so, then the President can take whatever part of the budget he wants and impound it without limitation. He can impound Star Wars, he can impound Social Security, he can impound railroad retirement, or any part to any degree of the Federal budget. Would the Senator agree with me on that?
David Cay Johnston: “If the Senator assumes that this amendment gives to the President that line-item veto, I assume that the Senator also…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment granting the President a line-item veto.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.
Is my friend saying he will not give aid to help them change the legal system until the legal system is already changed?
in the original form of our bill, we provided for 100 millirem radioactivity limit from the repository. However, because our friends from Nevada stated the EPA should have a role here, we amended that. The present bill now on third reading…





